Bus Uncle scene |
Original version
Re-used version
There are many other examples like Bus Uncle, which
became famous overnight, thanks to social media platforms like Youtube, and
were re-used from the Internet community in different context. The community’s
adopted videos show the creative potential, which is slumbering in today’s
society. But it also indicates that own ideas are getting rare, because in the
end they only coping existing content and mash it with other existing content.
It can be seen as a kind of content recycling. On the other hand, the increasing participation creativity uses the collective
intelligence, which is a common procedure in creating innovation, too. That
means for example that 10 people have more ideas then just one. So, there is a
real potential for the growth of new ideas. But the problem is, this potential
isn't often used in the way it could, cause most creators of such videos just
want to attract attention from the audience and for that they publish content
which is disruptive, but not primarily creative.
Another aspect, which has to be mentioned, especially
in the Bus Uncle story, is the ethical point of view. More and more people are
becoming the amusement for others without their approval. It’s kind a open
voyeurism. On the other hand, videos like Bus Uncle points out the problems a
society has. Here it was particularly the frustration potential caused by
society pressure, which could heading to an overreaction like this.
Nevertheless, Youtube & co. gives a lot people the
chance to show their abilities and ideas to a big audience. Although the
comment function is a feature of all social media platforms, nowadays senders
become the feedback from the audience indirect through the community's re-use of their
content.
"In our context, circulation of ideas means that there is no direct flow back to the sender. The transfer back gets substituted by a creative and productive re-usage of ideas once emitted into circulation.” (Marek, 2009).
In this way, ideas really have the possibility to growth
and becoming something big, cause of the usage of the collective intelligence.
But in the other way, the question will be arisen, who will be the owner of the
idea in the end, especially if an idea become a commercial success. This question
can end up in a legal argument between participants because the own part
on the successful idea, developed in a participative way, will be blurred eventually. Anyway, this is a risk in participatory culture
and it’s good that this isn’t regulated from the beginning, otherwise the
creative potential will be limited.
References
Marek, R. (2009). Creativity meets circulation: internet videos, amateurs and the process of evaluation.
More information
References
Marek, R. (2009). Creativity meets circulation: internet videos, amateurs and the process of evaluation.
More information
- Article about Bus Uncle (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)
Kelsie: Hi, Adrian! To the honest I feel a little bit uncomfortable when I see the video of Bus Uncle because he behaved aggressive and rude towards a stranger who is without malicious offend. But I agree with you that it is meanwhile a real reflection of social issues that people are under too much pressure in nowadays hongkong. We can see that Youtube can be a platform where people show, express,or uncover something. Also your point of "open voyeurism"is a great perspective.
ReplyDeleteCarol: Hello Adrian, your blog is looking great, so well done. Your answers are thoughtful and thorough and you are using examples, quotes, evidence etc to support them and adding links to other sites. All good! I think however you can go into a little more depth about youtube and creativity , the pros and cons of the rise of such 'participatory culture' and the extent to which such videos disrupt expectations.
ReplyDelete